Community | Website | Tools

“If everyone agrees, you won't create much value. Deviate when you have an edge.” -FS

👋 Welcome

The meritocracy cosplay is getting expensive. Stanford says AI screeners can bury qualified candidates at scale, layoffs now arrive dressed as “agentic strategy,” and weak outreach gets deleted before your résumé loads. So no, the game is not fair. But it is legible: beat the bot, bypass the portal, keep the skills that still pay, and follow the companies with real money.

• 🚨 The Big Story: Stanford research showed a top ATS rejected 40,000 qualified people.

• 📉 Layoff Report: Webflow, SentinelOne, Meta WARN, Minute Media

• 🧠 The Hiring Mgr’s Brain: Outreach that leads with your needs gets deleted.

• 📊 Trends & Data: AI hasn’t killed the need for core tech skills.

• ☀️ The Bright Spot: New Jersey makes severance the law, not the favor.

• 🏢 Companies to Watch: Factory AI, Corgi, Thea Energy, Crusoe are staffing up.

🚨: The Big Story

Stanford research showed a top ATS rejected 40,000 qualified people.

A post from @OrevaZSN on X caught the whole mood of the 2026 job hunt:

“Boomers be like, 'Just walk into the office and ask for a job.' The office: locked. The recruiter: AI. The interview: automated. The job posting: fake. The rejection email: instant. Your data: sold.” 

It cleared 75,000 likes and roughly 713,000 views in two days, and the replies turned into a group venting session about ghosted applications and listings that feel like data-harvesting fronts. The same week, Stanford (with Chapman and Northeastern) published the largest study yet of AI hiring tools: more than 4 million applications, screened by one dominant third-party vendor, with clear racial disparities. Stanford HAI, Fortune

Why it matters: The researchers found that 26% of Black and 15% of Asian applicants applied to roles where the model screened their group below the EEOC's four-fifths threshold. Had it advanced them at the top group's rate, about 40,000 more applications would have moved forward. And because roughly 90% of US employers lean on the same handful of screening vendors, one biased model can quietly reject the same person everywhere at once. Meanwhile Colorado, which was set to switch on the country's broadest AI-hiring anti-discrimination law June 30, pushed it to 2027 and stripped the duty of care meant to prevent algorithmic discrimination (signed May 14). Colorado rollback

Our take: The rage in those replies is pattern recognition that finally has receipts. One myth worth killing while we're here: the famous 'an ATS auto-rejects 75% of resumes' stat is junk. It traces to a 2012 sales pitch from a company that folded in 2013, and recruiters keep saying the same thing: software doesn't reject you, volume does. Entry-level roles now pull 400 to 2,000-plus applicants, humans can't read them, so AI triages, and the Stanford data shows that triage carries bias at industrial scale.

So the system got faster, cheaper, and more discriminatory in one motion, and the one law about to hold it accountable just slipped 18 months. The old advice ('just walk in') is dead. The new meta: optimize for the robot, then go around it to a human.

What to watch:

• Whether the EEOC or plaintiffs' firms move on the Stanford findings. Once a vendor is named in court, 'the algorithm did it' stops being a shield.

• Other states filling Colorado's gap. California finalized AI hiring rules in late 2025 and Illinois disclosure rules are landing; the patchwork is where your protection now lives.

• Vendors publishing real bias audits. Some claim 'responsible AI' is fairer than humans. Fine: the burden is on them to show the receipts.

Your move:

• Keyword-mirror every resume to the exact phrasing in the job description, then run it through a free ATS checker before you submit.

• Network around the bot. Referrals still skip the screening layer entirely. One warm intro beats 50 portal applications.

📉 Layoff Report (Who got cut, how, and why)

Webflow, SentinelOne, Meta WARN, Minute Media: 134,603 YTD.

• Webflow: Announced May 27. Undisclosed count (roughly 140 on prior 8% rounds). 'Agentic web' AI pivot, delivered via a morning laptop lockout. Severance was 16 weeks base pay plus 6 months COBRA. See Developing Stories. Source

• SentinelOne: Announced May 29 alongside soft Q1 guidance. ~300 cuts (about 10% of staff). CEO Tomer Weingarten called it a 'leaner, more agile' rebuild; the real pressure is competition from Palo Alto and CrowdStrike. A $25M restructuring charge tells the story. Source

• Meta (WARN filings): Filed May 29. Formal notices named 2,212 engineers at the SF HQ, plus 313 in Sunnyvale and 74 in Playa Vista, part of the broader 8,000-person, ~10% global cut. Teams hit include Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, and the BizAI and Core Ads groups. Source

• Minute Media: Announced May 28. ~12% of staff (about 60 people), as the sports-media company reversed course on VideoVerse after a $200M acquisition. A reminder that the cuts aren't only at the AI-pivot crowd. Source

Bottom line: Skillsyncer counts 134,603 tech workers cut across 212 events so far in 2026, roughly 874 a day. The 'AI-native' and 'agentic' framing now arrives in the announcement before the headcount does. Treat the vocabulary as the warning shot.

🧠 The Hiring Manager’s Brain (One thing HR actually cares about)

Outreach that leads with your needs gets deleted.

Recruiters and founders say the fastest way to get ignored is a cold message that opens with what you want. The notes that earn a reply open with something specific and true about the person or company you're contacting.

This shows up across 2026 LinkedIn recruiting guidance: generic templates fail because they start with the sender's needs, not the recipient's interests. It's the same reason your application to the careers portal disappears while a sharp two-line note to a hiring manager gets answered, and why referrals beat the screening layer the Big Story is about.

What to do about it: Before you send any outreach, write one sentence that proves you did your homework: a product detail, a recent raise, a problem you can see they have. Lead with that, then make your ask in one line. Skip the resume paste.

📊  Trends & Data (What the numbers are saying)

AI hasn’t killed the need for core tech skills.

Overview : Indeed Hiring Lab’s new analysis finds that tech and healthcare roles are unusually “skill-concentrated,” meaning one skill category makes up more than 50% of required skills. For tech jobseekers, the big takeaway is blunt: AI may change workflows, but employers are still asking for core technical fluency, especially in software development, infrastructure, and data roles.

The numbers

• 11 of 45 analyzed occupations are skill-concentrated.

• The average US job posting on Indeed required 14 individual skills in Q4 2025.

• Tech roles had 76.3% of skills come from the technology category.

• Software development was the most concentrated tech occupation, with 79.4% of required skills coming from technology.

• IT systems & solutions was less concentrated, with 48% technology skills, 18.2% business operations, and 11.2% leadership and communications.

Why this matters for jobseekers

• Do not assume “AI skills” can replace fundamentals. For SWE, infra, and data roles, job descriptions still heavily weight languages, frameworks, systems, and technical execution.

• If your search is stalled, target less concentrated tech-adjacent roles. IT systems, solutions, data analytics, RevOps, HR tech, and business systems roles may reward a mix of technical, business, and communication skills.

• Rework your resume by skill category, not just job title. Group evidence around technology, business operations, stakeholder communication, systems integration, and leadership.

• For career pivots, lead with transferable skills that show up broadly across postings, especially business operations and leadership.

• In interviews, prepare examples that connect technical work to business workflows. That matters more in roles where technology is only part of the skill mix.

☀️ The Bright Spot (Proof that it's not all bad out there)

New Jersey makes severance the law, not the favor.

While tech debates whether 16 weeks of pay counts as 'generous,' one state already settled it. New Jersey is the only state that mandates severance for covered mass layoffs, guaranteeing one week of pay per year of service under its expanded WARN law, on top of notice requirements. No memo, no CEO's mood, no negotiation: workers caught in a qualifying reduction get paid by law. With Colorado just delaying its AI-hiring protections to 2027, it's a reminder that the floor can be raised. Every other state should copy the homework. Source

👀 Companies to Watch (Fresh money, open roles, and reasons to apply now)

Factory AI, Corgi, Thea Energy, Crusoe are staffing up.

• Factory AI: Raised a $150M Series C for agent-native software development tools. Open roles include AI Engineer, Platform Engineer, Enterprise AE, and a Technical Recruiter (a tell that they're scaling hiring). Careers

• Corgi: AI-native insurance startup that doubled its valuation to $2.6B just three weeks after its last round, about $378M raised total since a January 2026 Series A. Founders Emily Yuan and Nico Laqua, YC-backed. The kind of breakneck pace that funds aggressive hiring. Coverage

• Thea Energy: Fusion startup that added a $100M oversubscribed round (week of May 25). Hiring on Lever across program management and engineering. A clean way out of pure consumer tech and into hard-tech. Jobs

• Crusoe: AI infrastructure (compute and data centers), hiring across engineering and ops. Remote-friendly roles, and the infra layer is where the $700B AI buildout actually spends. Careers